Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 




      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: ss 4000 & eCost

For whatever it's worth, David, I for one do not have a problem with
whatever software Polaroid, Nikon, Minolta or any other company bundles or
fails to bundle with its products.  I buy the product for itself, not for
the bundled software which is just window dressing as a rule.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Hemingway, David J" <HEMINGD@POLAROID.COM>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 3:41 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: ss 4000 & eCost

| Symantics, There are two bundle configurations and Silverast is not the
| difference, it also includes binuscan. We try our best to provide
| configurations to please the most customers. I guess in some eyes you are
| dammed if you do and dammed if you don't.
| I guess I don't see anything I can add that will help Polaroid customers
| present or future get better scans or keep their scanners functioning
| is my main reason for being here so I will bow out of this particular
| conversation.
| Regards
| David
| > -----Original Message-----
| > From: Austin Franklin [mailto:darkroom@ix.netcom.com]
| > Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 4:08 PM
| > To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
| > Subject: RE: filmscanners: ss 4000 & eCost
| >
| >
| >
| > > Silverfast is not an "extra cost option" on the SS120.
| >
| > Isn't it an option, as in, you can buy the scanner without it
| > if you want?
| > Doesn't it cost more to buy the scanner with SilverFast than
| > without it?
| > Then why isn't it an "extra cost option" if it costs more,
| > and is an option?
| > I must be missing something...
| >


Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.