ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Vuescan trials



Dana writes ...

> The reason that either set of mask values gave acceptable images is
> that
>  1. The image you were scanning was reasonably balanced
>     (had good whites and blacks), and
>
>  2. You had selected (probably) "White balance" in the color
>     tab, as well as "Auto white point" and "Auto black point".
> ...

  Yes ... I figured something like that was going on.  As it turns out, the
R,G,B mask values all should be near 1.0.  Ed's response to the newsgroup
implies the scanner, if 'negative' film is indicated, will boost the
exposure for blue and green.

  Vuescan users should note the difference in mask values if the non-exposed
film is not measured.  If not measured properly, I imagine all other white
balance options will not work properly.

shAf  :o)




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.