ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Anti-Newton Rings powder



I suppose one could always go into lycopodium farming...

(and regarding your memory lapse, perhaps you've been sniffing those
spores?)
;-)

Art

Tony Sleep wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 2 Sep 2001 09:03:54 -0700  Karl Schulmeisters
> (karlsch@earthlink.net) wrote:
> 
> > Thanks I've always wondered what the big deal with glass carriers was
> > because I figured dust would be a hassle, and any glass between the
> > negative
> > and the sensor (be it CCD or PhotoPaper) simply serves to decrease
> > contrast.
> 
> Unfortunately I seem to have had some sort of neural meltdown when it came
> to discussing anti-Newton-ring powder. I wrote that it was 'something weird
> like lycopodium spores'. A day or so later, and away from the computer, I
> realised with some horror that is fingerprint powder, so I do hope nobody
> has ordered a 20lb bag :) Still, it will at least show up whether your film
> is clean of fingerprints <g>
> 
> Regards
> 
> Tony Sleep
> http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info
> & comparisons





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.