Filmscanners mailing list archive (email@example.com)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: filmscanners: That's some overclocking
I think something is a little overclocked. <BG> The speed of
light is 2.99 times 10E10 (that is 3 followed by 10 zeros) cm
per second. One of the outcomes of Einstein's theory of
relativity is nothing can travel faster then the speed of light.
I don't know the size of the actual chip, but if the chip was 1
cm long and presumably an electrical signal would have to travel
the length of the chip sometime, then in a single cycle that fast
electron would travel 1 cm. That would be an average speed of 7
times E10 cm per second or more then twice the speed of light.
Note I said average speed. Since the electron must start and
stop the actual top speed would need to be even faster.
In fairness I beleive chips are smaller then 1 cm (but larger
then 0.1 cm), so my little argement is not valid; however, today
distances and the time to travel those distances are a
significant part of the limitation for chips. So I feel with
some confidence the 70 gHZ number is not possible. I would
personally be amazed at a number of 7 gHZ with the currently
available chip manufacturing processes -- using Xrays to layout
the grid might make that possible.
Gordon Potter <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Nashville, TN 37215