ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: film vs. digital cameras -wedding/commercial photography




> Austin Franklin wrote:
> >
> > > Of course, the loupe-heads will be
> > > unhappy with a 100 dpi image, but, if it is a large format print, only
> > > bad manners says you should be scrutinizing it at 8", anyway.
> >
> > Or, that's where you just happen to be standing ;-)
>
> If circumstances place you in an embarrassing situation (for yourself or
> others), kindly etiquette is to keep what you see to yourself. I suppose
> that should extend to if one is placed in the position of viewing other
> people's pixels from having to stand too close as well ;-)
>
> Art

Yes, I agree, but that does not mean that I would not be unhappy about it.
I know you will find this quite hard to believe, but I actually keep a lot
to my self that I am unhappy about ;-)




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.