ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: film vs. digital cameras - wedding/commercial photography



> Sorry it took so long to answer this (been sick).
> Lets make this really simple. Take three scenarios:
> 1: The four sensor chip we've been discussing so far (GRGB).
> 2: A beam splitter with three monochrome chips of the same size as above.
> 3: One chip with twice the density (each pixel position contains full RGB
info).

> You're saying that scenario 1 will produce the BEST image?

No, I did not say that anywhere.  3 will "probably" give you the best image,
but it entirely depends on implementation, 2 may, and 1 may.

> But I don't agree that the current crop of consumer/prosumer CCD chips is
the
> best solution.

But I never said it was!




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.