ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: film vs. digital cameras - wedding/commercial photography




--- "Robert E. Wright" <rew@impulse.net> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Austin Franklin <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
> > > "...The digital camera gives you only 6M*8bit/channel=6Mbytes..."
> > > 6Mpixels *8bits/channel *3channels = 144Mbytes. This assumes 3
> bytes/pixel
> > > it may be higher if bit deepth per channel is greater than 8.
> > > Bob Wright
> >
> > Er, no.  That would be 144M BITS, not bytes, which is 24M Bytes...
> >
> Mea coupa! But still greater than 6 Mbytes.

Again, the 24Mbytes(@8bit/channel) are INTERPOLATED. The camera (S1,
D1x) only captures 1 channel (not 3) for each pixel!!!! But that's it.
I won't repeat it again.

Robert

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.