ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: (anti)compression?



On Mon, 06 Aug 2001 22:01:28 -0400  Jim Snyder (jimsnyder@insight.rr.com) 
wrote:

> ZIP works by actually packing the data into "empty space". As a result, 
> the
> size does not vary as much, but is lossy. 

AFAIK Zip and LZW (as found in compressed TIFF) are fundamentally the same 
algorithms. Neither are lossy, both substitute shorthand codes for 
recurring patterns of data.

Regards 

Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info 
& comparisons




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.