ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Anyone having problems with Scan@leben?



I use McAfee on my home machine.  It's the same deal, $40 a year and daily 
updates.  I haven't noticed any impact on my system's performance and it's 
saved my bacon a number of times.

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: Bigboy9955@aol.com [mailto:Bigboy9955@aol.com]
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 8:23 AM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Anyone having problems with Scan@leben?


In a message dated 08/02/2001 6:56:18 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
TonySleep@halftone.co.uk writes:

<< Quite honestly, anyone who uses a PC without running a competent antvirus 
 program is driving down a one way street with their eyes closed. Norton AV 
 costs very little ($40US), updates are automatic (nightly here) and free 
 for a year, >>

Norton is (was) very HEAVY on my system.  It would constantly crash and burn 
regularly and slow down my system to the point it was unusable.  I believe I 
tried it when they came out with 6.0 (?) version 1 1/2 years ago I think.  
Maybe they got the kinks worked out of it but it left such a bad taste in my 
mouth I swore I would never try it again.  Should I?

Ed




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.