Quietly, Frank, q-u-i-e-t-l-y. If it ain't broke, don't fix it; and the way
the Vuescan driver works with my Acer is *more* than very acceptable. :-)
Best regards--LRA
>From: "Frank Nichols" <frank@theNichols.net>
>Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
>Subject: RE: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners: Vuescan gripes)
>Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:29:57 -0600
>
>Ed,
>
>If you are not doing anything to intentionally increase/modify the
>exposure,
>and several of us feel sure the exposure is different when using VS as
>opposed to Mirofoto - do you have any ideas what may be causing this
>effect?
>
>I was thinking the auto exposure system based it's calculations on info
>gained while focusing and if you do the focusing differently that could
>explain it?
>
>Frank Nichols
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> > [mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of EdHamrick@aol.com
> > Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 1:50 PM
> > To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> > Subject: Re: Scanning multiple times (was Re: filmscanners: Vuescan
> > gripes)
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 7/23/2001 2:19:32 PM EST, arwbackup@worldnet.att.net
> > writes:
> >
> > > Sometime back Ed mentioned there was a SCSI command that causes
> > an extra
> > 20%
> > > exposure on the scanwit and he enables it always.
> >
> > I vaguely remember someone telling me that Acer claimed there
> > was a command that caused an extra 20% exposure on the ScanWit.
> >
> > I haven't seen any evidence of this command though, and I don't
> > know where or how it's used.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ed Hamrick
> >
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
