Filmscanners mailing list archive (firstname.lastname@example.org)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: filmscanners: My replacement 8000 is banding like the first one :-(
> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com
> [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of rafeb
> Sent: 20 July 2001 14:11
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: My replacement 8000 is banding like the first
> one :-(
> At 12:03 PM 7/20/01 +0100, Jawed wrote:
> >Dare I say it, but I suspect a scanner moving the film is "less accurate"
> >a scanner that moves the scan "head".
> I disagree, and I'm sure Austin will chime in here too <g>.
> All film scanners I've worked with move the film -- except
> for flatbeds with TPUs. The lamp and CCD stay put.
> This applies to:
> * Microtek 35t+
> * Polaroid SprintScan Plus
> * Minolta Scan Speed
> * Nikon 8000 ED
> * LeafScan 45
> All of the above scanners move the media. CCD
> and lamp are stationary.
> In fact, except for flatbeds posing as film
> scanners, I can't think of any film scanners
> that *don't* work that way.
Well in general I am wrong. But the LS40 and the LS4000 both move the
CCD/Light, not the film