Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: My replacement 8000 is banding like the first one :-(



Rafe wrote:

>...our entire job in this listserv sometimes seems to be second-guessing 
>the manufacturers and telling them what they did wrong. <g>

Seems to me they give us ample opportunity! ;-)

>My personal guess is that the better
>way is the one that moves the smaller
>mass -- all else being equal.

That's "Engineer Thinking" and also a Law of Physics, which makes perfect 
sense. It may or may not hold true in all cases--Physics still holds some 
surprises, IMHO. :-)

Best regards--LRA


Original msg > >
> > Given: That the stepper mechanism is accurate, and not just a piece of 
>trash...
> > Then: It would not matter whether the copy is moved or the scanning head 
>is moved.
>
>
>True enough, Lynn, but our entire job
>in this listserv sometimes seems to be
>second-guessing the manufacturers
>and telling them what they did wrong. <g>
>
>Jawed had expressed an opinion on which
>of two schemes might work better. I
>simply wanted to point out that, for
>better or for worse, most film scanners
>worked the other way.
>
>My personal guess is that the better
>way is the one that moves the smaller
>mass -- all else being equal.
>
>
>rafe b.
>


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.