Norman,
Yes, that's exactly what happened. Makes one feel sorta silly, doesn't it?
:-) That's one advantage of shooting transparencies--you can "bracket" to
your heart's content (and get some interesting results, as well). Besides,
on my Acer, they scan better. Usually. :-)
Best regards--LRA
>From: "Norman Unsworth" <unsworth_norman@aclink.org>
>Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
>Subject: RE: T400CN was filmscanners: Grain, Noise, et al
>Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 14:42:43 -0400
>
>Lynn,
>
>Actually we probably both had the same problem - if you don't specify with
>the lab their machine will automatically print each exposure as close to
>the
>'right' print they can. I've taken to stipulating that they use no
>compensation on any prints. When I got my most recent camera (Nikon N80) I
>took it out to test drive all the bells and whistles, including exposure
>and
>flash compensation. I hadn't asked them to print all the prints without
>compensation and when I got the prints back they all looked the same
>exposure-wise. Not much of a test and not very clever on my part.
>
>Norman
>
><< message3.txt >>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
