Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 




      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Which Buggy Software?

Dan's response would be that most repro houses don't use embedded color
profiles anyway - they do it the old-fashioned way.  If he's wrong, please
tell him ;)

There is a thread from his color theory list discussing this at


----- Original Message -----
From: "Tony Sleep" <TonySleep@halftone.co.uk>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 1:29 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Which Buggy Software?

| On Sat, 14 Jul 2001 07:14:41 -0400  rafeb (rafeb@channel1.com) wrote:
| > And as it turns out, I am a big Dan Margulis
| > fan... hence my rotten attitude about ICC
| > color management, etc.  I think, once you
| > start working in the "Margulis" mode, you're
| > probably spoiled forever from using these fancy
| > profiling and monitor-calibration tools.
| Just as a matter of interest, how does he accomodate interchange of RGB
| files with other systems, eg reprographic houses? Lend them your monitor?
| ;)
| I'm quite happy to agree that CM is a PITA and a plausible case can be
| made that it's more trouble than it's worth if you just scan and print
| your own stuff. But as soon as those files need to be viewed and printed
| elsewhere all bets are off. It's bad enough even /with/ CM.
| Regards
| Tony Sleep
| http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner
| info & comparisons


Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.