I've seen scanned grain from Fujicolor 160 negs that seemed about
equal or larger than scanned Fujicolor 800 negs, so I suspect you're
correct about the frequency intermodulation theory.
----- Original Message -----
From: Tony Sleep <TonySleep@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 3:14 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Grain aliasing myth (was Minolta DiMAGE
Scan & etc)
> On Sun, 1 Jul 2001 22:29:44 -0400 Dave King
> > You see grain size vary by tone/color in analogue prints too.
> > It
> > would be very interesting to compare CCD scans and inkjet prints
> > analogue enlargements. I'm wondering if the grain variance effect
> > similar.
> Exactly this, and the appearance of sometimes massively worse grain
> dig. versions, was the original requirement for the grain aliasing
> Tony Sleep
> http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film
> info & comparisons