ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: OT: Film grain



"Dave King" <kingphoto@mindspring.com> wrote:
> In other words, it's not really "overexposing" the film to rate it one
> to two stops slower than the manufacture's recommendation.

Hm.  OK.

> LED scanners are different than enlargers however, and overexposure
> more than two stops may build enough density to cause problems.  A
> good general rating for most C-41 films is one stop overexposure (for
> best quality).

I haven't seen anything in a C41 neg scan I could put down to problems
with density with my LS30.  Slides, yes.  Negs, no.  Only silver negs.
They are *really* hard to scan.

Rob





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.