RE: filmscanners: what defines this quality?

[rafeb <rafeb@channel1.com>]

At 11:50 PM 6/19/01 -0400, Dan wrote:
>> I am now on a 4x5 and starting to think, hm, 8x10 would be nice.
>
>I once met a woman about my age (40) who has shot with only one camera since
>high school (and she's been a professional photographer since then): an old
>Wista 8x10 with a single lens.  That's it.  She only shoots b&w film and
>always uses palladium printing.
>
>And her work is absolutely stunning.  You can see some of it from here:
>
>http://www.mastersofphotography.com/Directory/rdeluise/rdeluise_bio.html


Which all goes to show -- it's not the tools, it's the technique.

Or as Maria Muldaur put it, way back when -- it's not the meat, 
it's the motion.


rafe b.