Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Was New Nikon performance, nowdust





On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Yuri J Sos wrote:

> On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 06:47:38 -0400 (EDT), you wrote:
> 
> >First off, Supra is a C41 print film.  Superia, 
> >as I recall, as an E6 positive film.  Fuji's 
> >"equivalent" to Supra might be Reala, perhaps.
> 
> Not so.  Superia is a C41 colour negative film.  Fuji claims that
> Superia contains Reala technology ( the extra colour layer) and is
> thus a replacement for Reala.
> 
> See this at Fuji's US site (nb long URL - you may need to cut and
> paste if your email client wraps it)
> 
> 
>>http://www.fujifilm.com/tcm.html?x-tempest-op=generic&ContentType=Product&UserTypeId=2&CategoryId=67&CurrentTopCategory=2&pagetype=UserTypeCategoryHome
> 
> I suspect you are thinking of Fuji's E6 positive film Sensia.



Yes, I was confusing the two.  So how do they 
compare?  Which is better (Reala or Superia) 
at the same ISO?  Given that I like Reala, 
would I like Superia?


rafe b.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.