ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: New Nikon performance



On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Hemingway, David J wrote:

> Ed,
> I have been biting my tongue throughout this whole dust conversation but I
> guess I am finally baited out. I have done actual scans on the scanner with
> a LED light source and the SS4000. It was quite obvious to me that there was
> considerably more dust shown on the scanner with the LED light source. I
> also noticed the scans were more contrasty. I will leave it to others to
> decide whether this is good or bad but in my view it is actual.
> David
>
<SNIP previous msg.>

And when you adjust contrast so they are both the same then how does it
appear?




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.