Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new scanners



The Supra line is supposedly 'optimized' for scanning, but I read somewhere
on these newsgroups (I can't cite chapter or verse) that the primary
'optimization' consists of extra protection against scratches as opposed to
improved grain.

I did also take a roll of Kodak Portra VC 160, and it scanned fairly well.

Maris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Scales" <tscales@attglobal.net>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 7:06 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new scanners


| Supra 100?  Am I missing something?
|
| Tom
|
| P.S. I'm actually not blown away with Supra. I prefer Fuji in my SS4000
|
| > Maris wrote:
| > > Slide film is generally less grainy than print film
| > > in scanning sky.  Have you found any good print film for sky?
| >
| > Someone mentioned Supra 400.  I wish someone would produce
| > a 100 ASA print film optimised for scanning!
| >
| > Rob
| >
| >
| >
| > Rob Geraghty harper@wordweb.com
| > http://wordweb.com
| >
| >
| >
|
|




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.