Rob wrote:
>Lynn, what scanner are you using? An Acer I think?
Right on. I don't think it was the scanner's fault, this time, although
Scanwit's density-range leave lots of room for improvement. :-) It was
definitely the camera (and the operator)--I'd have done better to meter the
grass, with the bright background out of sight. But it was a new camera
(then).
What puzzles me most was the "woven effect" which only affected the blue sky
(which was "perfectly exposed"), and not the rest of the tranny.
Best regards--LRA
Lynn wrote:
> so in reflective color. Result: another poorly-exposed slide that looks
> fine on a projection screen, not-so-great on a 2700ppi scan.
Rob
Rob Geraghty harper@wordweb.com
-----------------------------------------------
FREE! The World's Best Email Address @email.com
Reserve your name now at
