ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: 110 film



Bob wrote:

> I think you must realize that the 110 format probably didn't
produce the best negative or transparency because it relied on a plastic
cartridge to hold the film flat and at the precise film plane.

That's certainly true for the inexpesive 110 cameras, but I recall that
Asahi (Pentax) produced a well-made and fairly pricey 110 miniature in the
70's, and Olympus may have, too. How many were actually sold, I don't know.
The Minox was a particularly good piece of equipment, although specialized.
OTOH, it's pretty hard to put a "price" on people's memories. Printing the
photos and flat-bedding them is a viable option for one who hasn't yet
invested in a film scanner, but there's a wide variety needs and
considerations in the scannning community. That makes it both interesting
and complicated.

Best regards--LRA


-----------------------------------------------
FREE! The World's Best Email Address @email.com
Reserve your name now at http://www.email.com





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.