ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements



I had understood that grain removal was a by-product of the ICE-type
cleaning and therefore could not be separated.  If it can, certainly I agree
that should be an independent option.

Maris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark T." <markthom@camtech.net.au>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 12:28 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements


| At 09:17 AM 14/03/01 +1000, Rob wrote:
| >> why would you want to seperate these?  to allow the
| >> option of grain removal WITHOUT clean?
| >
| >Yes, or to allow varying intensities of clean without
| >grain removal.  They should be two separate drop down
| >options, and with the interface changes in 7.0 there's
| >plenty of space.
| >
| >I for one would like to be able to see the effect of
| >grain removal on its own without having to combine it
| >with cleaning.  Then also, a frame might need only mild
| >cleaning but heavy grain removal.  At the moment, I
| >don't have that as an option.
| >
| >Rob
|
|
| Are Rob and I alone in wanting this change from Ed?  If anyone else on the
| list also thinks this is a good idea, please say so now!
|
| Mark T.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.