ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution



Not in my experience; it only increases menu and tool sizes in the OS
interface and maybe Microsoft applications.  A number of independent
applications have fixed menu and tool sizes built into their programs which
adjust with the changes in resolution but not with changes in the OS
settings for menu and font sizes.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 5:51 AM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution




Frank Paris wrote:

> All of that can be handled, since you can specify large icons, etc.
>
> Frank Paris
> marshalt@spiritone.com
> http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684
>

Does using "large icons" also increase menu and tool sizes within a
program, like Photoshop?  Inquiring minds want to know! ;-)

Art

>
>> Lastly, even if
>> my video card and monitor can produce 1600 x 1200 pixel screen, I'd be
>> unlikely to use it that way, due to the way it would shrink icons,
>> cursor and tool sizes on a 17" screen.
>>
>> Art
>
>





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.