ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2k? Does is manage color like W98SE?



That was just a figure of speech. Obviously there are many things about the
two systems that are absolutely identical. In areas of performance in large
hardware configurations and in reliability, aspects of particular interest
to filmscanners, 2000 has it all over 98.

Frank Paris
marshalt@spiritone.com
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of shAf
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 8:40 AM
> To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2k? Does is manage color like
> W98SE?
>
>
> Frank writes ...
>
> > Windows 2000 is in every way superior.
> >
>
>       But it handles color management the same as Win98se ...
>
> shAf  :o)




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.