ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2k? Does is manage color like W98SE?



Windows 2000 is in every way superior.

Frank Paris
marshalt@spiritone.com
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of ALLM Rose
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 4:56 AM
> To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> Subject: filmscanners: Anyone using Win2k? Does is manage color like
> W98SE?
> 
> 
> I am considering whether to reload Win98SE, WinMe or Win2000 
> Professional on
> my Athlon 700 (256MB SDRAM) system.  I am currently using Win98SE, Adobe
> Photoshop 6.0, printing with an Epson 870 through WiziWYG color profiles,
> and scanning images through my Nikon LS-30 with Vuescan.
> 
> Does anyone see any potential conflict that would make Win2000 a 
> bad choice?
> Does it manage .icm files like Win98SE?
> 
> Is anyone using Win2000 successfully with their scanners and 
> color profiles?
> 
> Any and all advice very appreciated!
> 
> Mark Rose
> 




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.