ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements



----- Original Message -----
From: "Collin Ong" <collin@pcocd2.intel.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 3:12 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements


> On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, shAf wrote:
>
> > I though Ed made the point: "clean" would NOT soften the image
except
> > in the regions where dust was removed, BUT that softening kicks in
for
> > "scrub" & "scour" because of his grain removal algorithm is used(?)
>
> Ed,
>
> I think many on the list would vote for a separate checkbox control to
> enable grain removal independently of the clean/scrub/scour setting.

but scrub = clean + grain removal
and
scour = clean + heavier grain removal

why would you want to seperate these?  to allow the option of grain
removal WITHOUT clean?

~j





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.