Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: filmscanners: Vuescan - A few technical questions
I assumed that LEP is one pass at a slower-than-normal speed. If so, it
shouldnl't be subject to mis-registration that MP can cause on some scanners
(SS4000).
--Joel Nisson
----- Original Message -----
From: "shAf" <michael@shaffer.net>
. After I saw the mis-registration for LEP, I scanned again at 16x MP
only.
>I couldn't see where LEP improved over
> 16x MP. After all (Ed may comment), what's the difference between
> increasing the exposure time and scanning mutiple times?? I can
> understand how exposing for shadows improves film response, ... but
> digitally, we are only making numbers larger or averaging smaller
> numbers ... both would seem to produce the same effect for dense areas
> of film(?)
>
> shAf :o)
>
|
