Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprintscan 120 ??



My sense was the issue was which technique provided the highest quality.
I.e. they wanted every bit of sharpness they paid for.
David

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Frank Paris [mailto:marshalt@spiritone.com] 
Sent:   Monday, February 19, 2001 6:26 PM
To:     filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject:        RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprintscan 120
??

> output levels and therefore anything that slows down output is avoided.
> The amateur, on the other hand, has rarely such a need and usually likes
> their equipment to embrace as many functions as possible in a single
> product.
> This is seen as good value for money, which I would suggest is the case.
> He is not likely to be selling his scans for profit and therefore
> has little
> need for high output of digitised images and is also not likely
> to have any
> time deadlines to meet.
>
> Richard Corbett
>

I think this is the wrong message to send to a representative of a
filmscanner manufacturer. Amateurs most definitely want a system that saves
time, the moreso the more they have lives outside filmscanning.

Frank Paris
marshalt@spiritone.com
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.