Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 




      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprintscan 120 ??

My sense was the issue was which technique provided the highest quality.
I.e. they wanted every bit of sharpness they paid for.

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Frank Paris [mailto:marshalt@spiritone.com] 
Sent:   Monday, February 19, 2001 6:26 PM
To:     filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject:        RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000 ED or Polaroid Sprintscan 120

> output levels and therefore anything that slows down output is avoided.
> The amateur, on the other hand, has rarely such a need and usually likes
> their equipment to embrace as many functions as possible in a single
> product.
> This is seen as good value for money, which I would suggest is the case.
> He is not likely to be selling his scans for profit and therefore
> has little
> need for high output of digitised images and is also not likely
> to have any
> time deadlines to meet.
> Richard Corbett

I think this is the wrong message to send to a representative of a
filmscanner manufacturer. Amateurs most definitely want a system that saves
time, the moreso the more they have lives outside filmscanning.

Frank Paris


Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.