ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Future of Photography (was filmscanners: real value?)



In article <001101c09058$976feb30$617079c0@drt4>, austin@darkroom.com 
(Austin Franklin) wrote:

> 
> > > What does the phrase "Plus X does not reveal grain" mean?
> >
> > Not alegbra;) Plus-X is a Kodak ISO125 B&W film.
> 
> And...exposed, and developed correctly, scanning it at 5080 or less 
> will not
> show grain...
> 
> I prefer D-76 1:1.
> 
> 
But you want the grain!

Otherwise you can't claim that the scan has captured all possible detail 
from the negative...




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.