Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems



Could it possibly be  because it is easier and cheaper for them to output to in terms of storage and transportability as well as because everyone seems to assume that everyone wants their scans for use on the Web and do not really know about or concern themselves with such matters as quality?
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk [mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of WRGill@aol.com
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 9:19 AM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Cc: WRGill@aol.com
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems

If what you say abouut TIFF being the way to go, why then are the Majority of
Labs still scanning to the JPEG format? Would like an explantion, as I am
still amazed with digital imaging proceedures.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.