ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office



Sorry to hear that you broke your delete finger; hope it gets better soon.
:-)

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Michael Moore
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 6:35 PM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: paperless office


I realize we all get a little OT at times, but this thing has gone on for
DAYS
...


"Hornford, Dave" wrote:

> True electronic signature systems include three components -
> non-repudiation, authentication, and no-change.
> Like a pen signature, an electronic signature has to change the document
not
> sit beside the document.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laurie Solomon [mailto:laurie@advancenet.net]
> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 10:59 AM
> To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office
>
> >Eventually, through the use of bio-metrics, your electronic "signature"
> >will be as "good" and as unique as your fingerprint.
>
> What you say may be true enough; but even that only guarentees the
> authenticity of the signature and not the content of the document that the
> signiture has been affixed to.  Hence the problem of counterfeiting still
is
> not solved when it comes to the authenticity of documents.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.