ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Pigmented inks was Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value?



Yes, it would definitely be an uphill fight.

One could read the Epson position even more broadly than just ink 
flow-related problems.




At 12:12 PM 1/29/01 +1000, you wrote:
> > A: EPSON does not recommend refilling or using 3rd party ink
> > cartridges. Using these products will not void the Epson
> > warranty, however, if these products cause a failure, the
> > repair of that failure will not be covered under warranty. "
>
>Which is essentially what I wrote below - any problem caused
>by 3rd party inks is not covered by the warranty. :)
>
> >>I suspect Epson would take a different view if the reason the printer
> >>was being returned has due to head blocks caused by non-OEM
> >>inks.  AFAIK Epson's official line is that the use of 3rd party inks
> >>voids the warranty as far as anything to do with the ink flow is
> >>concerned.
>
>
>
>Rob Geraghty harper@wordweb.com
>http://wordweb.com




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.