Lexa Software: Nginx-ru@sysoev.ru archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: nginx-ru

Nginx-ru mailing list archive (nginx-ru@sysoev.ru)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ZFS, XFS, and EXT4 filesystems compared

To: Монашёв Михаил <nginx-ru@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ZFS, XFS, and EXT4 filesystems compared
From: Монашёв Михаил <postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 20:47:51 +0400
In-reply-to: <681193476.20070905140913@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: SoftSearch.ru
References: <681193476.20070905140913@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Здравствуйте, Михаил.

В продолжение темы: 
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2007-September/042690.html

raidz оказался в 2 раза медленнее raid5, написанного pjd!

-- 
С уважением,
Монашёв Михаил, SoftSearch.ru
mailto:postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
ICQ# 166233339
http://softsearch.ru/
Без бэкапа по жизни.

Follow-Ups:
- RAID-5, RAID-Z and RAID 1, RAID 10 compared
  - From: Gena Makhomed

References:
- ZFS, XFS, and EXT4 filesystems compared
  - From: Монашёв Михаил

Prev by Date: Re: Проблема с memcached
Next by Date: RAID-5, RAID-Z and RAID 1, RAID 10 compared
Previous by thread: Re: Re[4]: ZFS, XFS, and EXT4 filesystems compared
Next by thread: RAID-5, RAID-Z and RAID 1, RAID 10 compared
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread