Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 




      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Advice on scanner settings

I think raid 0 is probabaly as safe as it gets. Once you
spread the data, then I agree things could get exciting.
There is a chance of the OS peeing on your data.

I hav
e a Seagte external for backup, but I have nothing that c
an handle 3T. However it took me a while to fill up the 6
00 Gbytes on my system. (Four 300G drives in RAID 10.)

I finally went digital with a 5D Mark II, so I figure I
will be filling the drives at a faster rate. Live View is
 certainly better than a magnifier on the viewfinder. 
-----Original Message------
From: Tony Sleep
Sender: fi
To: lists@lazygranch.com

ReplyTo: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: [filmsca
nners] Re: Advice on scanner settings
Sent: Feb 25, 2009
 6:24 PM

On 26/02/2009 lists@lazygranch.com wrote:
I just bought three 1.5 terrabyte drives

RAID can add
resilience but no way can it be considered safe, so don't

forget the other 4!

Here I have:
3 x 1TB RAID3 = 2T
2 x 1TB for backup (on another LAN PC)
2 x 1TB for of
fsite backup.

So that's 7 x 1TB for 2TB of storage. I
don't trust HDD's much.


Tony Sleep

nsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'un
subscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_dig
est' (as appropriate) in the message title or body

Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 


Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.