Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: film and scanning vs digital photography



I also think it is not correct to simply use jpeg fine with 'no sharpening' for 
the comparison, as the defaults in each camera could well be different. Some 
sharpening is likely to be applied in camera to a jpeg even if switched to zero 
sharpening. 

He explained away the fact that he could not do a raw test comparison by the 
fact that he could not find a raw converter that would do both formats, 
possibly the case a couple of years ago when he did that test, but I would have 
imagined PS could have done it with both plugins. 


 

-----Original Message-----
From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk 
[mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk] On Behalf Of Bob Geoghegan
Sent: Thursday, 12 July 2007 2:21 AM
To: Hanna, Mark (x9085)
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: film and scanning vs digital photography

Yes, there are all sorts of ways to define the perfect comparison test
depending on what's most relevant to the way each of us would use the gear,
let alone a "perfect" lab evaluation.  Rrslett is a reliable source but
he's working with his own requirements & tastes -- a cold weather nature
photographer fond of long lenses.
Bob G

-----Original Message-----
From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk] On Behalf Of gary
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 9:07 PM
To: bobgeo@dgiinc.com
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: film and scanning vs digital photography

I wish they were a bit more scientific in their analysis. For instance,
Canon makes more than one 300mm lens.

Bob Geoghegan wrote:
> Hmmm, 12 MP but in different sizes.  Consider the Nikon D2X(s) vs Canon 1D
> mkII or 5D.
> http://www.naturfotograf.com/D2X_rev00.html
> http://www.naturfotograf.com/D2X_rev06.html#top_page
>
> Results may vary, of course.
> Bob G

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body
Notice
This email, and any attachments transmitted with it, is confidential and may 
contain sensitive or privileged information. If you are not the named recipient 
you may not read, use, copy, disclose, distribute or otherwise act in reliance 
of the message or any of the information it contains. If you have received the 
message in error, please inform the sender via email and destroy the message. 
Opinions expressed in this communication are those of the sender and do not 
necessarily represent the views or policy of Crown Castle Australia Pty Ltd. No 
responsibility is taken for any loss or damage sustained from the use of the 
information in this email and Crown Castle Australia Pty Ltd makes no warranty 
that this material is unaffected by computer virus, corruption or other 
defects. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.