ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: large scanning project



Laurie,

Which one of us should take this issue up with the "powers that be" at
MS?  After all, this seems to be exactly the kind of issue we are
supposed to be empowered to get an answer about, yes? ;-)

Email me.

Art

Laurie Solomon wrote:

> Tony, the question, for which I do not know the answer, are the existing
> ASPI layers 32 bit only, 64 bit only, or neutral with respect to the bit
> architecture.  I suspect that like drivers the currently available ASPI
> layers from Adaptec and Microsoft may be written to 32 bit architectural
> specifications and therefore not usable by 64 bit devices, systems, or
> software.  Moreover, Ed's software may be written to 32 bit
> architectural specifications and not work in 64 bit systems or recognize
> 64 bit hardware if such hardware exists.  (As an aside, I do not think
> that the hardware in the case of peripherals is 32 or 64 bit
> intrinsically but that will depend on the hardware's firmware).
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.