ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: 'Cheap' film scanner recommendations



Consider the £169.99 incl.vat Plustek OpticFilm 7200.

It's 7200dpi optical scan - highest resolution of any film scanner.
http://www.datamind.co.uk/Merchant/Plustek_OpticFilm_7200_homepage.htm


Chris Street


>-----Original Message-----
>From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
>[mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk] On Behalf Of Simon Pearson
>Sent: 19 July 2005 13:07
>To: chris@street56.fsbusiness.co.uk
>Subject: [filmscanners] 'Cheap' film scanner recommendations
>
>I have been recommended this list after posting a question on the yahoo D70
>mailing list, so hope you can help...
>
>I have a collection of around 2500 slides, mostly Kodachrome (and a handful
>of negative), that I would like to eventually get around to scanning so
>that
>I have a digital archive of them all, plus this will mean they actually get
>looked at a bit more often.....
>
>I do not need them to be scanned at any fantastic resolution since they
>will
>only be for web use and/or maybe small prints (under 7x5), since if I want
>a
>large print, I would just use the original slide.
>
>Also bearing in mind since turning digital I have not taken another film
>photo, so once the slides are scanned the scanner will effectively be
>defunct, so the less I can spend the better....  I had been thinking of
>getting a flat bed scanner since that at least wouldn't become defunct, but
>the quality isn't as good (for film) and I've never felt the need for a
>flatbed ever anyway, so it too would probably be defunct.....
>
>I have been thinking along the lines of the Minolta Scan Dual IV plus
>Vuescan software since it gives me a RAW file. The RAW file appeals since
>it
>is effectively the same as a 'normal' RAW file in the digital camera sense,
>the basic data is there and I can return to it at any time in the future to
>tweak and get the most out of it.
>
>Any advice greatly appreciated.....
>
>BTW I know that this will be a very onerous task taking me a few years to
>complete, but the good side is that the slides aren't getting any more
>numerous so an end is always in sight!
>
>Cheers,
>
>Simon
>>From sunny/wet Bolton.....
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>-------------
>Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
>filmscanners'
>or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
>or body



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.