ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: CS 5000 ED vs. Minolta ???



What current film scanners are not now made with LED light sources these
days?

Scott

Berry Ives wrote:

>Since I have the Coolscan V ED, all this makes me glad I'm not shooting
>slides.  I assume my scanner would have the same issue as the CS 5000.
>Someday I'll probably get some of my old slides out and scan them, though.
>And now I know that if I discover one that has edge softness I can't stand,
>to remount it and try to get it flatter. If that fails, I might rephotograph
>it with my slide copier, using very bright light, shooting with negative
>film, and then scan that.
>
>Berry
>
>
>
>On 6/24/05 4:10 AM, "Arthur Entlich" <artistik@shaw.ca> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Oh well, back to this again...
>>
>>The problem, as you stated, is depth of field.  The answer has been cold
>>cathode lighting which can be rather bright.  I had both a Minota Dimage
>>Scan II and I stilll have a SS4000 Polaroid, and with both, one needed a
>>rather badly warped film to have focusing problems.  I never have needed
>>to use glass carriers or special mounts to get good sharp images across
>>the full surface.
>>
>>
>>The problem has been and continues to be use of LED lighting sources,
>>which do not have adequate light output to use stopped down apertures.
>>
>>Art
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>wbgilloolyjr@charter.net wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>The truth is you shouldn't be trying to scan slides in their original
>>>cardboard mounts.  They should be either remounted in glass or a high
>>>quality glassless mount (Wess or Gepe) that will hold the film flat.
>>>
>>>No amount of autofocusing is ever going to bring the center and the
>>>edges into optimal focus if the film isn't flat.
>>>
>>>If the lights on these scanners were brighter, the lens could use a
>>>smaller aperture which would help, but that's the realm of professional
>>>scanners.
>>>
>>>Mr. Bill
>>>
>>>
>>>Laurie Solomon wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>So Mike what you are saying is that unless the Nikon has a manual focus like
>>>>the Minolta does the problem is not correctable with the Nikon scanner but
>>>>is correctable with the Minolta; but both scanners have the problem under
>>>>the autofocus option.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>----------
>>Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
>>filmscanners'
>>or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
>>body
>>
>>
>
>
>
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.