ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: NikonScan negative question (was Dynamicrangequestion)



From: "Dieder Bylsma" <scanners@spacemoo.com>
To: <verkaik@sympatico.ca>
the only problem is that Nikon's scanning software is quite aggressive on
the
white points/black points and loves to make things super-contrasty, despite
what I've set in its preferences for black/white points of 0.01% each.
>>

I don't seem to have that problem on my 4000ED with NS4 on XP. But I do
notice that green tends to crowd the white point end, so I set my Gain down
by .15 for that channel.

Gain is (I presume) the only way to affect how much light gets through the
film. For dark inages but with a maxed out bright region, it's tricky but
you can increase Gain and then twist the curves to prevent burnout, ending
with more shadow detail. However, I find NikonScan rather good at estimating
the available detail. I rarely get more out of a dark image without losing
it to noise anyway.

Ed Verkaik

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.