ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Dynamic range question



> From: Andrew Skretvedt
>
> In evaluating a film scanner, one should consider its dynamic range. How
> deep can a scanner reach in and pull out shadow details from a very
> contrasty slide, for example. What about one that might have been
> underexposed a bit as you tried to keep from blowing out highlights?
>
> I've seen some dynamic ranges posted for certain scanners here and
> elsewhere, many appear to be measured figures. But for the Minolta
> DiMAGE Scan Dual III and IV, the posted figure is 4.8 (calculated).
>
> That figure appears to be the theoretical dynamic range for the bit
> depth of the capture. Of course this is not going to be its true range.
> Does anyone know the actual range of these scanners? How is dynamic
> range measured?

Dynamic range is limited by noise in the sensor. You rarely see specs on
this, even though a meaningful spec standard could certainly be devised.

--

Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
Paul                mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.