ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] scanning at less than optical res



Is this correct?


"As I understand things, a scanner with an
optical resolution of 4800dpi can take a sample reading every 1/4800 of an
inch. If you scan at the optical resolution, that is what is does and you
get 4800 readings per inch along that axis (usually a different resolution
on the other axis).

If you scan at 1200dpi, the scanner usually either samples all the 4800
possible data points per inch and throws three out of every four away, or
only samples every fourth possible point. So you are only getting one
quarter of the possible data from the film. So why scan at large format if
you are throwing three quarters of the film data away?

With Vuescan software, you can set it to scan all 4800 data points per inch,
but then to take the average of every four data points and reduce them to
one, so that the file you get out is the equivalent of a 1200dpi scan, but
all the data points have contributed to the final result."

Bob Frost.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.