ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Vuescan - slightly OffTopic



From: "Al Bond" <al@greenspace.freeserve.co.uk>
>>>>>>>>>>>
> An s50 with a 10D sensor
> and a proper v/f would be a far, far better camera. If a bit bigger
> and quite a bit more expensive, fine - it'd be worth it. Personally, I
> don't care about zooms on this sort of camera - it's asking too much.

And I thought I was the only one who didn't care about zooms!  I'd even
be happy with a fixed focal length lens if it sorted out the other
shortcomings.  Something based on the Ricoh GR1 would be nice :-)

However, I guess it would be too much of a niche market to develop,
unless it carried a silly price tag like the Epson r/f.
<<<<<<<<<<<<

Put the 24/2.8 on a Canon 300D, and you've pretty much got what you're
asking for. Sure, it's larger/heavier than an Oly OM1n with a 35mm lens, but
it's definately in a similar ballpark.

David J. Littleboy
Tokyo, Japan

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.