ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Sharpening after scanning (SS4000): questionforArt



I just received two copies of this email I posted, and am wondering if
others received more than one.  I checked my 'sent mail' and it shows it
  having only gone out once.  I'm wondering if it is my mail server, or
something happening elsewhere.

I don't need everyone to reply, so if a few people indicate either that
they did or did not receive a duplicate, unless your experience was
different from those posted, it isn't necessary for you to reply publicly.

Thanks

Art

Arthur Entlich wrote:

> What you are saying makes sense, in terms of the progressive unsharp
> masking process, and indeed my own workflow sometimes includes this.
>
> One of the reasons I came to this was because I found occasional
> upsetting artifacts showing up once I had completed the manipulation and
> compositing work when I then did the large USM at the end.  Suddenly,

<cut>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.