ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Better DOF than Nikon?



> How much better are they? Will a Minolta (for instance) handle my rippled
> slides just fine, or will it be only somewhat better? I'm trying to decide
> whether I should invest in a new scanner, or fix the old one. I wish
> scanners had standardized DOF specs.

Paul,

I would be more interested in the carriers than anything else, if I were
you...since a good carrier might reduce your rippling by quite a bit.
Hence, why I suggested the Leaf...as you could remove the film from the
slide mount, and it uses standard Beseler 45 film carriers (as well as a
very nice custom set of rotating film holders), which would allow you to get
about as flat as you could with a glassless carrier...and...glass carriers
are available (in 4x5).

Regards,

Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.