ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Pentax *ist D


  • To: lexa@lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Pentax *ist D
  • From: "Martin Greene" <camerabuggy@earthlink.net>
  • Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 07:25:33 -0500
  • In-reply-to: <200311051847.1ahAb74DD3NZFjX0@robin>
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

Rob

Take a look at a review of the Petax ist D by Michael Reichman of
Luminous landscape that just appeared.  Unfortunately, it gets a
mediocre, just adequate, evaluation.

Martin

On Wednesday, November 5, 2003, at 07:00 PM,
<filmscanners_Digest_owner@halftone.co.uk> wrote:

> Topic: Pentax *ist D
> ===============
> Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 19:50:01 +1000
> From: "Rob Geraghty" <robg@wordweb.com>
> ----------------------------------------
> If anyone has had any experience with the new Pentax Digital SLR,
> please
> contact me off the list.  I had a look at one today, and just checked
> the
> specs.  On the surface at least, it looks like the sort of thing I was
> hoping Pentax would make - a camera that lets me use my existing
> lenses, and
> provides about the same number of pixels as scanning film with my LS30
> (about 3000x2000).
>
> Rob
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.