ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: [filmscanners_Digest] filmscanners Digest for Thu 23 Oct,2003



> From: Bob Frost
>
> I was suggesting that since the Epson upsampling is apparently done by the
> Nearest Neighbour method, one might get better results by doing it oneself
> with a better upsampling method such as Bicubic, Lanczos, or Vector, and
> applying sharpening afterwards. The makers of QImage claim that
> to be true.

The 2200 driver has a "smooth edges" option, which I assume applies a better
resampling filter instead of using the dumb "nearest neighbor" filter.
However, I haven't tried it on a test image.

--

Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
Paul                mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.