ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Pixels and Prints



Austin,

Surely you can; it just isn't 'original' detail. But to anyone who hadn't
seen the original detail, it might look just as good. After all, people pay
millions for artists' representations of original detail, so why shouldn't a
digicam representation of original detail make a good picture. It might not
be an 'accurate' record, but then neither is the painting, and I doubt if
'accurate record' pictures are what turn most people on. They clearly are
what turns you on, but you are unusual I suggest!!

Bob Frost.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Austin Franklin" <austin@darkroom.com>

> You can't create detail where detail didn't exist in the
> original file in the first place.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.