Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] Re: Pixels and Prints
I'm curious what your ppi is when you print to that 13 x 19? It's got to
be in the low 100's.
-Bill
> I'm very sure!
>
> The Pro 70 was the first consumer digicam with CFII and hence Microdrive
> compatibility, it's that old :-)
>
> It has a great lens and RAW capability so can dodge JPEG artifacts
> altogether.
>
> I know it's pushing the accepted wisdom, but people have mistaken the
> pictures for commercial posters so it's not just my opinion.
>
> And I meant 13x19, A3+ or B+ size - that was a typo.
>
>
> In article <IMEKIBPDGJAEFIHJOLKMKELMCLAA.laurie@advancenet.net>,
> laurie@advancenet.net (LAURIE SOLOMON) wrote:
>
>> >I've produced very acceptable 13x9s from a 1.68 megapixel camera, the
>> Canon
>> Pro 70.
>>
>> Are you sure it is 1.68 megapixels? That is so low that I doubt they
>> are
>> even selling digital cameras with that few megapixel capacity.
>> As for what is or is not very acceptible depends subjectively on one's
>> tastes and standards; besides 13x9 is a somewhat smaller image than a
>> 13x19,
>> although 13x9 may be pushing the envelope for a 1-2 megapixel camera
>> since
>> the typical wisdom is that you need at least 3 megapixels to produce a
>> satisfactory 8x10.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
