ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Pixels and Prints



Thats what I get for doing math late at night, my bad.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul D. DeRocco" <pderocco@ix.netcom.com>
To: <karlsch@verizon.net>
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 10:19 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Pixels and Prints


> From: KARL SCHULMEISTERS
>
> Realistically, a 6mPixel camera is equiv to 4000dpi scan of 35mm film.
> Which generates some amazing images, but still doesn't quite
> match film when you enlarge it.

4000dpi comes out to about 4K by 6K, or 24M. A 6Mp camera is closer to a
2700dpi scanner.

> Save your pennies for when D1s technology makes it down to $2500,
> or get the
> 10D as a camera to use when you don't really intend to go much bigger than
> 8x10

That's only good advice if you're obsessive about sharpness, and intend to
examine the prints with a loupe. Believe me, the 10D makes very nice 12x18
prints.

--

Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
Paul                mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
or body

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.